Skip to main content

State v. Lucas

Citations

  • 240 N.E.3d 843
  • 2024 Ohio 842

Syllabus

Confrontation domestic violence endangering children trespass firearm nontestimonial excited utterance hearsay exception sufficiency manifest weight. Defendant's confrontation rights were not violated by the trial court's admission of the victim's nontestimonial statements. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the victim's out-of-court statements pursuant to the excited utterance exception to the prohibition against hearsay. Defendant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.