Skip to main content

State v. Ford

Citations

  • 302 Kan. 455
  • 353 P.3d 1143
  • 2015 Kan. LEXIS 447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Drope, Pate, and Dusky
  • \[I]t is generally true that changes in the law apply prospectively and only to cases on direct review.\
  • '[I]t is generally true that changes in the law apply prospectively and only to cases on direct review.'
  • failure to comply with K.S.A. 22-3302's requirements for competency hearings does not deprive the court of jurisdiction
  • failure to conduct competency hearing is a due process violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.