Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/17/2020
State v. Hill
Citations
- 467 P.3d 473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court's dismissal of the defendant's motion as untimely absent defendant arguing or showing excusable neglect
- characterizing motion challenging due process of plea entry as request to withdraw pleas
- \Pro se pleadings are liberally construed to give effect to the pleading's content rather than the label and forms used.\
- before court addresses excusable neglect, defendant must make some effort to demonstrate neglect exists
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-10· cited 323×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-05· cited 132×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-02-16· cited 65×
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 56×
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 47×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-07-31· cited 41×
- State v. EbabenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-20· cited 28×
- State v. ParksSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-06-01· cited 22×
- State v. SzczygielSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-06-29· cited 22×
- Tyler v. Cowen Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 20×
- – State v. FoxSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-12-06· cited 18×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-06-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.