Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/12/2013

State v. Mitchell

Citations

297 Kan. 118
298 P.3d 349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding K.S.A. 60-1507 provides the exclusive statutory remedy to collaterally attack a criminal conviction and sentence
change in law applies to cases pending on direct review and not yet final on date of appellate court decision
change in the law acts prospectively, applying “ ⅛ all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final’ ”
change in caselaw acts prospectively, applying “ ‘to all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final’ ”
change in the law acts prospectively, applying \'to all cases . . . pending on direct review or not yet final'\
criminal defendant could not rely on K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 60-260(b)—a statute authorizing relief from a final judgment or order in a civil action—to mount collateral attack on convictions and sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.