Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/12/2019
State v. McAlister
Citations
- 444 P.3d 923
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant has a right to receive the benefit of any change in the law that occurs while the direct appeal is pending
- \K.S.A. 22-3504's statutory directive that an illegal sentence may 15 be corrected 'at any time' supersedes the normal procedural hurdles of res judicata and retroactivity.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SartinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-08-16· cited 68×
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-12· cited 18×
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-03-05· cited 12×
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2023-12-22· cited 4×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-10-02· cited 3×
- State v. GalesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-10-04· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-22· cited 422×
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-05-25· cited 213×
- State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-04-19· cited 115×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-07-31· cited 41×
- State v. JamersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-01-25· cited 25×
- State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-02-08· cited 16×
- State v. NoyceSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-27· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.