Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/19/2019

State v. Murdock

Citations

439 P.3d 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that in a direct appeal, a defendant will receive the benefit of any change in the law that occurs while the direct appeal is pending
setting \a threshold burden to prove that a subsequent development in the law undermines the earlier merits determination\
finding res judicata not applicable when a development in the law shows that a previous illegal sentence motion was improperly denied
\[A] party may seek and obtain the benefit of a change in the law during the pendency of a direct appeal.\
\[A] defendant will receive the benefit of any change in the law that occurs while the direct appeal is pending.\
\[A] defendant will receive the benefit of any change in the law that occurs while the direct appeal is pending.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stegall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.