New Mexico Court of Appeals· 5/1/1996
State v. Flores
Citations
- 920 P.2d 1038
- 122 N.M. 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that a de facto arrest supported by probable cause is lawful
- providing that a de facto arrest supported by probable cause is lawful
- if check on gun had been run during the scope of the valid investigatory stop, it would have been valid; because of time delay, it was not
- “A party opposing summary disposition is required 12 to come forward and specifically point out errors in fact and/or law.”
- scope of search for weapons during investigatory stop is limited to its protective purpose
- finding reasonable suspicion under similar circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bosson, Pickard, Bustamante
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-21· cited 182×
- State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-10-01· cited 162×
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 114×
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-31· cited 106×
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-12· cited 76×
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-11-25· cited 67×
- State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-09-07· cited 58×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-12-06· cited 54×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 47×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-05-07· cited 47×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 47×
- State v. NyceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 46×
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-08-27· cited 44×
- State v. IngramNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-06· cited 43×
- State v. ChapmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-06-16· cited 42×
- State v. SewellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 40×
- State v. RyanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-16· cited 37×
- City of Albuquerque v. HaywoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 37×
- In Re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00)New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 35×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,525×
- United States v. WackerTenth Circuit· 1995-12-26· cited 358×
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
- United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeTenth Circuit· 1985-05-10· cited 185×
- United States v. Henry EspinosaTenth Circuit· 1986-01-24· cited 185×
- United States v. Anthony J. DichiarinteSeventh Circuit· 1971-06-04· cited 170×
- United States v. Kevin Wesly Dewitt, True Name, Kenneth Odell RisonTenth Circuit· 1991-10-15· cited 159×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- United States v. Frederick v. PayneD.C. Circuit· 1986-11-21· cited 128×
- State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-08· cited 111×
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-02-09· cited 80×
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-07-02· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.