New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/31/2005
State v. Duran
Citations
- 120 P.3d 836
- 138 N.M. 414
- 2005 NMSC 034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that travel plan questions are permissible under fourth amendment rule that \all questions asked by police officers during a traffic stop must be ... reasonably related to the initial justification for the stop or are supported by reasonable suspicion\
- concluding that travel plan questions are permissible under fourth amendment rule that “all questions asked by police officers during a traffic stop must be . . . reasonably related to the initial justification for the stop or are supported by reasonable suspicion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maes, Bosson, Minzner, Serna, Chávez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LeyvaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-02-17· cited 190×
- State v. HubbleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 169×
- State v. BrusuelasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-04· cited 149×
- State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-11-06· cited 84×
- State v. FunderburgNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-04-15· cited 80×
- State v. HugheyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 72×
- State v. KetelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-05-20· cited 69×
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-09-07· cited 59×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-12-06· cited 54×
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 47×
- State v. Van DangNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-31· cited 47×
- State v. SewellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 40×
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-04-10· cited 37×
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-09-23· cited 32×
- State v. ARMENDARIZ-NUNEZNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-09· cited 22×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-10-17· cited 21×
- State v. BrickerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-05-01· cited 21×
- State v. FigueroaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-03-31· cited 20×
- State v. CANDACE S.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-12-27· cited 19×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- United States v. Mateen Yusuf Shabazz, A/K/A Edward L. Eberhart, A/K/A Edward Wallace, and Keith Lamar ParkerFifth Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 480×
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1984-11-13· cited 466×
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- United States v. Terry L. WoodTenth Circuit· 1997-02-07· cited 340×
- United States v. Dennis Dayton HoltTenth Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 279×
- United States v. Tommie T. ChildsSeventh Circuit· 2002-01-18· cited 240×
- United States v. Salvador Ramos, United States of America v. Servando RamosEighth Circuit· 1994-12-07· cited 210×
- United States v. Mariano MurilloNinth Circuit· 2001-07-06· cited 166×
- State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-10-01· cited 162×
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 151×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-05-01· cited 129×
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 114×
- State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-08· cited 111×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.