New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/9/1995
State v. Reynolds
Citations
- 890 P.2d 1315
- 119 N.M. 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an individual has no legitimate subjective expectation of privacy in license, registration, or insurance documents and must produce them
- holding that after a valid investigatory stop an officer is entitled to verify that “the driver is both licensed and driving a car that is registered and insured”
- holding that continued detention is reasonable, and approving (1) the request for license, registration, and insurance documents; and (2) a computer check on the vehicle’s license plate number
- holding that an officer who stopped a motorist for safety reasons reasonably detained the vehicle and its passengers for the purpose of obtaining the driver's identification, registration, and proof of insurance
- holding that an officer who stopped a motorist for safety reasons reasonably detained the vehicle and its passengers for the purpose of obtaining the driver's identification, registration, and proof of insurance
- holding that after a valid investigatory stop, an 10 officer is entitled to verify that the driver is licensed and driving a car that is registered 11 and insured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Franchini, Baca, Ransom, Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-10-01· cited 162×
- State v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 132×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-05-01· cited 129×
- State v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-27· cited 122×
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-10-23· cited 116×
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-31· cited 106×
- State v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-30· cited 83×
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-11-25· cited 67×
- State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-09-07· cited 58×
- Schuster v. New Mexico Dep't. of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-03-21· cited 54×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-05-07· cited 47×
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-08-27· cited 44×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-02· cited 42×
- Robertson v. Carmel Builders Real EstateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-11-21· cited 39×
- State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-12-06· cited 38×
- John Does v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-08-01· cited 37×
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-04-10· cited 37×
- City of Albuquerque v. HaywoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.