Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 169 Conn. 322
  • 363 A.2d 72
  • 1975 Conn. LEXIS 824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding on basis of similar instructions that when read as whole, instructions adequately instructed and gave jury clear understanding of issues involved and proper guidance in determining issues
  • interpreting text of General Statutes § 54-85a, which is the same as Practice Book § 42-36
  • quantity of narcotics is factor for jury to consider in determining intent to sell
  • reasonableness of duration deter mined by circumstances of each case
  • “court correctly instructed the jury that to establish that the defendant had possession of narcotics it was necessary to prove that he had exercised dominion and control over the substance, had knowledge of its presence, and had knowledge of its narcotic character”
  • defendant possessed forty-five bags of heroin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House, Cotter, Loiselle, Longo, Barber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.