State v. Li-Yu Chang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding jury may presume an actor intends the natural consequences of his or her act
• holding an actor is presumed to intend the natural consequence of his or her acts
• determining proof of intent required under section 708.1 was sufficient when natu ral consequence of defendant’s act was to place victim in fear of painful or injurious contact
• interpreting statutory words “damage ... done intentionally” as requiring State to establish that defendant intended to cause the damage
• holding the intent must be to damage the property
• finding sufficient evidence of intent from circumstances surrounding assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).