Richards v. Anderson Erickson Dairy Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statutes should be interpreted so as to effectuate their intent, and, consequently, declining to interpret chapter 616 in such a manner that would “transform statutes of convenience into statutes of inconvenience”
• noting “the legislature’s silence over the years is evidence of its tacit approval” of an established statutory interpretation
• “[I]t must be remembered that venue statutes are statutes of convenience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).