Skip to main content

Martin v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 271 S.E.2d 123
  • 221 Va. 436
  • 1980 Va. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that jurors who indicate that they will not apply the correct standard of proof shall be stricken for cause
  • conviction of murder of police officer reversed for error in jury selection
  • if court fails to secure impartial jury for litigant, conviction must be reversed
  • if court fails to secure impartial jury for litigant, conviction must be reversed
  • “Proof that a prospective juror is impartial and fair, we stated, ‘“should come from him and not be based on his mere assent to persuasive suggestions.”’” (quoting Breeden, 217 Va. at 300)
  • where the court held it was prejudicial error for the trial court to force a defendant to use the peremptory strikes afforded him by Code § 19.2-262 to exclude a venireman who is not free from exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.