State v. Kidd
Citations
- 24 N.M. 572
- 175 P. 772
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. According to his own testimony and that of others, he was assaulted with a deadly weapon, a pistol, and threatened with immediate death. There was evidence tending to show previous illicit relations between appellant and the wife of deceased. Under such circumstances it was not error to submit to the jury the issue as to the guilt of the defendant of voluntary manslaughter, and the proof was sufficient to support such a verdict. All that is required to reduce a homicide from murder to voluntary manslaughter is such heat of passion arising from such adequate provocation at the time as to excite in the mind such emotions as anger, rage, sudden resentment, or terror as may he sufficient to obscure the reason of an ordinary man, so as to prevent deliberation and premeditation and to exclude malice, and to render the slayer, acting as an ordinary man, incapable of cool reflection.</p> <p>P. 577</p> <p>2. The error in admitting a photograph in evidence which has not been accounted for is waived by a subsequent admission by the party concerned of its genuineness. P. 580</p> <p>3. Appellant was charged by the mother of the deceased with illicit relations with the wife of the deceased, and he failed to deny the same. The evidence was correctly received by the court as an admission by silence. In overruling an objection to the evidence, the court stated that he admitted it on the theory of an admission by silence, and that he regarded the silence of appellant as of great importance. While!' exception to the remarks was taken, no motion to withdraw the remarks from the jury was made. It is held, for that reason, that no available error intervened. P. 582</p> <p>4. Where counsel object to a question calculated to qualify a witness to speak to a certain point, and have opportunity given them by the court to disqualify the witness, but failed to do so, they cannot complain of his testimony.</p>
Judges: Boberts, Hanna, Pabkeb, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 479×
- State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-06· cited 71×
- State v. AbeytaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 71×
- Kinard v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1938-03-07· cited 71×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 47×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-05-16· cited 44×
- State v. AlanizNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1951-06-26· cited 42×
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-05-28· cited 33×
- State v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-09-15· cited 27×
- State v. KileNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-08-27· cited 23×
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-08-22· cited 21×
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1937-08-16· cited 21×
- State v. LuttrellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-02-06· cited 21×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-05-18· cited 18×
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-08-25· cited 18×
- State v. PruettNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-12-23· cited 18×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-01-27· cited 17×
- State v. SimpsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 16×
- State v. VasquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-12-22· cited 15×
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-11-06· cited 14×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court· 1884-03-03· cited 1,005×
- Commonwealth v. ColandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-04-10· cited 122×
- State v. EllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-10-27· cited 46×
- Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1910-05-12· cited 27×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-11-28· cited 24×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.