New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/14/1944
State v. Beal
Citations
- 146 P.2d 175
- 48 N.M. 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reversible error occurred upon a showing that the court improperly communicated with the jury regarding the case after the matter had been submitted to the jury, and the communication was not in the presence of the parties in open court
- at a time when New Mexico law did not routinely permit exhibits and instructions to be given to the jury during their deliberations, presence of both exhibits and instructions gave rise to presumption of prejudice which state did not rebut
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Threet, Sadler, Mabry, Bickley, Brice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 127×
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-09-05· cited 87×
- State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-05-19· cited 76×
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-08-15· cited 61×
- State v. OronaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-01-25· cited 61×
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-05-29· cited 57×
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 55×
- State v. UptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-09-23· cited 54×
- State v. McCarterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-01-09· cited 52×
- State v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-10-17· cited 44×
- Hovey v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-10-01· cited 38×
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-10-07· cited 36×
- Gerrard v. Harvey & Newman Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-04-25· cited 31×
- State v. MeltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-08· cited 30×
- State v. GunthorpeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-02-20· cited 30×
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-04-24· cited 27×
- Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-08-14· cited 25×
- State v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-10-19· cited 19×
- State v. GodwinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-03-20· cited 18×
- State v. JojolaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-10-18· cited 18×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court· 1919-05-19· cited 235×
- Little v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1934-11-20· cited 102×
- State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-10-08· cited 71×
- State v. EllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-10-27· cited 46×
- Outlaw v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1936-02-10· cited 40×
- Snodgrass v. Turner Tourist Hotels, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-01-10· cited 29×
- State v. ClementsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-06-08· cited 23×
- State v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1920-03-19· cited 22×
- Cunningham v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1905-09-01· cited 21×
- Whitney v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1906-03-01· cited 20×
- State v. BuckNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-08-30· cited 19×
- Federal Reserve Bank v. UptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-01-25· cited 15×
- State v. CostalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-01-09· cited 14×
- Diamond X Land & Cattle Co. v. Director General of RailroadsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-10-31· cited 11×
- State v. SanfordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-12-29· cited 7×
- Chavez v. TerritoryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1892-08-08· cited 7×
- State v. BabcockNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-20· cited 5×
- Victor American Fuel Co. v. MelkuschNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-04-22· cited 4×
- Hubert v. American Surety Co. of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1920-09-03· cited 4×
- Clark v. Carlisle Gold Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1889-03-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.