Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/12/2023

State v. Elkins

Citations

2023 Ohio 4521

Syllabus

The trial court's decision denying defendant-appellant's motion for a nunc-pro-tunc correction of a 2006 resentencing entry is affirmed because defendant-appellant did not appeal the resentencing entry, and the doctrine of res judicata accordingly barred his subsequent challenge to his sentence.

Judges: Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-23
State v. McGee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-21

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Saxon
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
State v. Simpkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 401×
State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-08· cited 312×
State v. Blanton
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 86×
State v. Elkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2002-06-11· cited 24×
State ex rel. Ogle v. Hocking Cty. Common Pleas Court
Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-10-03· cited 14×
State v. Elkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2004-02-24· cited 5×
State v. Watts
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-29· cited 2×
State v. Elkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-13· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.