Skip to main content

State v. Elkins

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 68

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences findings support in record aggregate sentence. The trial court made the required consecutive-sentence findings and those findings are not unsupported by the record. Further, appellant's argument that running his two prison sentences concurrently resulted in an excessive aggregate sentence is not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.