Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/11/2024
State v. Elkins
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 68
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences findings support in record aggregate sentence. The trial court made the required consecutive-sentence findings and those findings are not unsupported by the record. Further, appellant's argument that running his two prison sentences concurrently resulted in an excessive aggregate sentence is not well taken. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. VenesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.