Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/13/2021
State v. Elkins
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1271
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying Elkins' motion for nunc pro tunc judgment as the changes Elkins' sought were substantive legal changes not appropriate for correction by nunc pro tunc entry.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-11-30· cited 171×
- State v. ElkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2002-06-11· cited 24×
- State v. ElkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2004-02-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.