State v. Klesath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting similarities between excited utterance and contemporaneous declaration (present sense impression)
• noting similarities between excited utterance and contemporaneous declaration (present sense impression)
• a decision on severance \will be reversed only upon an affirmative showing that the district court clearly abused (its) discretion and that a defendant was prejudiced thereby\
• a decision on severance “will be reversed only upon an affirmative showing that the district court clearly abused [its] discretion and that a defendant was prejudiced thereby”
• “we recognize the desirability of increasing judicial appreciation of the general effects of drug use on perception, memory, and credibility and the knowledge that expert testimony may bring to this troublesome issue”
• “it is better practice for a district court sua sponte to caution the jury concerning an accomplice’s testimony, and . . it is reversible error to refuse to give a requested accomplice instruction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).