Skip to main content
· 1/11/1994

Heaslip v. Freeman

Citations

  • 511 N.W.2d 21
  • 22 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1347
  • 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 34
  • 1994 WL 4494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in statutory interpretation, a reviewing court must “look first to the specific statutory language and be guided by its natural and most obvious meaning”
  • in statutory interpretation, a reviewing court must \look first to the specific statutory language and be guided by its natural and most obvious meaning\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Parker, Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.