Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 8/29/2006
State v. Eakins
Citations
- 720 N.W.2d 597
- 2006 Minn. App. LEXIS 125
- 2006 WL 2474547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Legislation will fail rational basis review only when it rests on grounds irrelevant to the achievement of a plausible governmental objective.\ (emphasis added) (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross, Shumaker, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-05· cited 35×
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-09-22· cited 6×
- Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-06-10· cited 5×
- Fidele Ndaruhutse v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-13
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-04-07· cited 38×
- DeMars v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-07-13· cited 33×
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-08-13· cited 19×
- State v. TotimehCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-27· cited 10×
- State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-01-21· cited 6×
- State v. BissonetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-09-26· cited 6×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-08-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.