Skip to main content
· 3/31/2022

State v. Kuhlman

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1106

Syllabus

Appellant's appeal and request to stay the lower court's judgment are moot where the fine was voluntarily paid and appellant failed to demonstrate a collateral disability stemming from the conviction.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Massachusetts statute which specifically guarantees confidentiality of , trade secrets belonging to hazardous waste industries and submitted pursuant to regulations
  • requiring an adjudicatory hearing before DEQE released records alleged to be trade secrets protected by G.L.c. 21C, §12
  • “The words ‘trade secret’ are commonly thought to carry a connotation of a property interest.”
  • Hazardous waste facilities, which submit reports to state agency in accordance with agency’s hazardous waste regulations, have a property interest in whatever trade secrets may be contained in their reports.
  • “If due process requires any type of hearing, G. L. c. 30A, § 1 [1], mandates that the [agency] conduct an ‘adjudicatory proceeding’ in accordance with G. L. c. 30A, §§ 10, 11” [emphasis in original]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.