Skip to main content

State v. Kuhlman

Citations

  • 729 N.W.2d 577
  • 2007 Minn. LEXIS 175
  • 2007 WL 1017582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state law preempted city attempt to authorize red light cameras
  • holding that state law preempted city attempt to authorize red light cameras
  • holding a Minneapolis ordinance similar to Chicago’s invalid, as a matter of Minnesota law, because of the difference in the state’s and city’s approaches to enforcement
  • holding a Minneapolis ordinance similar to Chicago’s invalid, as a matter of Minnesota law, because of the difference in the state’s and city’s approaches to enforcement
  • stating that although home-rule-charter city with a general welfare clause has same power to enact traffic regulations, its regulations are not valid if they conflict with state law
  • finding red light camera ordinance requiring owner to rebut presumption that he or she was the driver was unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Kuhlman

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.