Skip to main content
· 12/27/1988

State v. Totimeh

Citations

  • 433 N.W.2d 921
  • 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 1269
  • 1988 WL 138122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that state met its burden to prove that appellant entered house without consent when he failed to comply when told to leave, thereby violating section 609.581, subdivision 4(c)
  • addressing the question of omitted findings in a discussion of the evidence’s sufficiency to support the conclusions
  • addressing the question of omitted findings in a discussion of the evidence's sufficiency to support the conclusions
  • implying a finding of the intent necessary to prove guilt
  • implying a finding of the intent necessary to prove guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schumacher, Huspeni, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.