Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 281 Kan. 169
  • 130 P.3d 69
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • seeking review of district court and Court of Appeals decisions holding that sentence was not illegal because district court had jurisdiction to sentence even though proceedings were not suspended while competency was determined
  • observing the court \has not specifically addressed the issue of retrospective competency hearings\
  • although the district court ordered a competency evaluation, no evaluation took place and no hearing was held
  • defense counsel was in best position to determine whether client’s competency was suspect
  • compliance with K.S.A. 22-3302 satisfies due process requirements
  • considering defendant’s own statements on the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, McFarland, Lockett, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.