State v. Duffy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under city ordinance proscribing “prostitution procurement activity,” nonexclusive list of activities that violate the ordinance were not separate elements or a separate crime but, rather, provided alternative ways to prove a single offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Antoine v. Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-24· cited 59×
• State v. Greeley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-14· cited 13×
• State v. Van Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-06

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Boots
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-09-26· cited 111×
• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-28· cited 61×
• State v. Shadley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-12-24· cited 34×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17· cited 15×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-07-12· cited 13×
• State v. Cooper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-03-12· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Aragorn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-30· cited 7×
• Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of Eugene
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-28· cited 6×
• State v. Averitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-08· cited 5×
• State v. Clements
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 1×