Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/12/2000
State v. Wright
Citations
- 7 P.3d 738
- 169 Or. App. 78
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the availability of pretrial criminal discovery is generally sufficient to cure imprecision in charging instruments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-24· cited 59×
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-04· cited 15×
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 5×
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-04· cited 5×
- State v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-27· cited 4×
- State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 3×
- State v. HollisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28
- State v. RolandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-01
- State v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-06
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.