State v. Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a complaint for “promoting gambling” must allege particular facts because the statutory definition of “promotes gambling” contained a nonexclusive list of acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Antoine v. Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-24· cited 59×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-17· cited 15×
• State v. Fair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-04· cited 14×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-24· cited 13×
• State v. Antoine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 10×
• State v. Reynolds
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-10-28· cited 9×
• State v. Duffy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 3×
• State v. Hansz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-03· cited 1×
• State v. Van Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sanders
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-12-28· cited 53×
• State v. Nussbaum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-12-15· cited 37×
• State v. Kincaid
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-02-26· cited 18×
• Barber v. Gladden
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1×