State v. Greeley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jury concurrence instruction was not required when the state relied on the defendant’s entire course of conduct to establish the elements of the offense of reckless driving
• concluding that a jury concurrence instruction was not required when the state relied on the defendant’s entire course of conduct to establish the elements of the offense of reckless driving
• “Defendant could have committed several acts that, alternatively, constituted evidence of a single element — recklessness—in an episode of driving that lasted no more than four minutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ashkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-09-11· cited 75×
• State v. Theriault
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-23· cited 16×
• State v. Teagues
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 10×
• State v. Rolfe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-03· cited 10×
• State v. Arellano-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-02-03· cited 9×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 4×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Boots
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-09-26· cited 111×
• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-28· cited 61×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-09· cited 15×
• State v. Houston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-26· cited 13×
• State v. Averitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-08· cited 5×
• State v. Duffy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-11-07· cited 3×