Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/5/1994
State v. Forrester
Citations
- 130 Or. App. 459
- 882 P.2d 1124
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compensatory fine intended to compensate members of victim’s family for wage loss and travel expenses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deits, Haselton, Riggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 31×
- State v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. S. J. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-01-25· cited 2×
- State v. ChoatCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-15· cited 2×
- State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-17· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 51×
- State v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-11· cited 14×
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Northwest Grocery Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-03-10· cited 9×
- Durkoop v. MISHLEROregon Supreme Court· 1963-01-23· cited 9×
- State v. BarkleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.