Oregon Supreme Court· 5/7/1985

State v. Hart

Citations

699 P.2d 1113
299 Or. 128
1985 Ore. LEXIS 1239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant was not entitled to a civil jury trial under the restitution statutes in ORS chapter 137
holding that criminal defendant was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under ORS 137.106
acknowledging that restitution “is a peculiar blend of both civil and criminal law concepts” but is not intended to be a “civil award” because of its goal of deterrence and rehabilitation for criminal defendants
according to the Oregon Crime Victims’ Needs Assessment, “offender accountability is the area within the criminal justice system most need- ing improvement”
analyzing whether the same restitution statutes entitled the defendant to a jury trial
analyzing whether the same restitution statutes entitled the defendant to a jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.