Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/27/2008

State v. Dingle

Citations

659 S.E.2d 101
376 S.C. 643
2008 S.C. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that in interpreting statutes, appellate courts look to the plain meaning of the statute and the intent of the Legislature
noting that the Department has the sole authority to determine parole eligibility separate and apart from the court's ability to sentence
noting that the Department has the sole authority to determine parole eligibility separate and apart from the court’s ability to sentence
“In interpreting statutes, the Court looks to the plain meaning of the statute and the intent of the Legislature.”
“In interpreting statutes, the Court looks to the plain meaning of the statute and the intent of the Legislature.”
finding defendant received the benefit of his plea bargain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.