Sullivan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it is not a violation of the ex post facto clause for the Legislature to enhance punishment for an offense based on a prior conviction of the defendant, even though the enhancement provision was not in effect at the time of the previous offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Furtick v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-13· cited 24×
• State v. Dingle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-27· cited 19×