Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/31/2003
State v. Peake
Citations
- 579 S.E.2d 297
- 353 S.C. 499
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 62
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing whether the State was estopped to prosecute a defendant based on representations made by someone regarding a civil action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleicones, Moore, Burnett, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1977-03-29· cited 204×
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-17· cited 152×
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 72×
- Heyward v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-06-05· cited 28×
- Ex Parte LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-11-06· cited 19×
- State v. PeakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-11· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.