Tilley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the consecutive nature of the sentence does not mandate that the sentence be served in a specific order absent the sentencing court’s clear articulation that the sentence be served in a specific order
• holding that the consecutive nature of the sentence does not mandate that the sentence be served in a specific order absent the sentencing court’s clear articulation that the sentence be served in a specific order
• ordering the Department to treat the consecutive weapons sentence as being served first such that the inmate could be considered for parole
• ordering the parole board to consider the five-year mandatory term for possession of a firearm as being served first such that the prisoner would be considered eligible for parole as the parties had intended
• ordering the Department to consider the consecutive, five-year mandatory term for possession of a firearm as being served first such that the prisoner would be considered eligible for parole as the parties had intended
• affirming PCR court's decision to grant Tilley's fourth PCR application when the applicant did not previously know he was parole ineligible for possession of a firearm because he received printouts each year from the Parole Board with his parole eligibility date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Franklin v. Maynard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-11-03· cited 35×
• Odom v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
• Major v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-24· cited 19×
• State v. Dingle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-27· cited 19×
• Gibson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-25· cited 6×
• Coats v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-13· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arnold v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-08-31· cited 93×
• Aice v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 71×
• Webb v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-04-04· cited 23×
• Foxworth v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-15· cited 8×