Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/4/2012
State v. Green
Citations
- 724 S.E.2d 664
- 397 S.C. 268
- 2012 WL 1111477
- 2012 S.C. LEXIS 69
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that criminal solicitation statute was narrowly tailored because it targeted only those who “knowingly” targeted minors for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity or a violent crime
- recognizing “speech used to further the sexual exploitation of children has been routinely denied constitutional protection as the State has a compelling interest in preventing the sexual abuse of children”
- rejecting a First Amendment challenge to section 16-15-342 and noting that “[cjourts have recognized that speech used to further the sexual exploitation of children does not enjoy constitutional protection.” (quotation omitted)
- rejecting a First Amendment challenge to section 16-15-342 and noting that \[c]ourts have recognized that speech used to further the sexual exploitation of children does not enjoy constitutional protection.\ (quotation omitted)
- upholding our criminal solicitation of a minor statute in the face of a vagueness challenge because a person of \common intelligence would not have to guess at what conduct is prohibited by the statute\
- \Prejudice occurs when there is a reasonable probability the wrongly admitted evidence influenced the jury's verdict.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Toal, Pleicones, Kittredge, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lo, Ex Parte John ChristopherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-30· cited 455×
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-28· cited 101×
- United States v. Fabian Montes-FloresFourth Circuit· 2013-11-26· cited 67×
- State Of Washington, V Russell David HomanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-15· cited 14×
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-04-22· cited 6×
- State v. SalleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-20· cited 3×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- State v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 263×
- United States v. Jeffrey MeekNinth Circuit· 2004-04-19· cited 207×
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 178×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
- United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Third Circuit· 2006-05-10· cited 174×
- United States v. GagliardiSecond Circuit· 2007-10-22· cited 153×
- United States v. Robert Owen BaileySixth Circuit· 2000-10-03· cited 126×
- United States v. SimsTenth Circuit· 2005-11-09· cited 111×
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 94×
- United States v. FarnerFifth Circuit· 2001-05-14· cited 92×
- Maloney v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-05-28· cited 74×
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-13· cited 73×
- State v. KnotenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-05· cited 70×
- State v. RungNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-13· cited 66×
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 61×
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-10-06· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.