Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/2/1996
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 237 Conn. 518
- 679 A.2d 902
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inclusion of common design language in instruction on accessory liability for murder was improper because state is not required to prove specific intent to kill under common design theory
- “[o]rdinarily, intent can only be inferred by circumstantial evidence; it. may be and usually is inferred . . . from conduct”
- inclusion of common design language in instruction on accessory liability for murder was improper because state is not required to prove specific intent to kill under common design theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-05-06· cited 129×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-09-14· cited 89×
- State v. BovaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-03-18· cited 80×
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-25· cited 73×
- State v. WinotSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-16· cited 69×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-26· cited 64×
- State v. CowardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 63×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-02· cited 63×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-09· cited 54×
- State v. ColtherstSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 50×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-16· cited 49×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-30· cited 46×
- Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 42×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-22· cited 35×
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-03· cited 32×
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-26· cited 30×
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-19· cited 28×
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-24· cited 27×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-23· cited 184×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-14· cited 130×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-30· cited 121×
- State v. RamsundarSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-09· cited 115×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 112×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.