Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/9/1999

State v. Delgado

Citations

247 Conn. 616
725 A.2d 306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that ‘‘it [was] not reasonably possible that the jury was misled’’ when court did not contradict concededly correct initial and first supplemental charges in challenged second supple- mental charge
remanding for modification of judgment to reflect that § 53-202k is not separate offense
not reasonably possible that jury was misled where trial court did not contradict concededly correct initial and first supplemental charges in challenged second supplemental charge
\the [jury is] not bound to accept as true the defendant's claim of lack of intent or his explanation of why he lacked intent\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
“ ‘[a] trial court often has not only the right, but also the duty to comment on the evidence’ ”
“ ‘persons acting with the mental state required for commission of murder, who intentionally aid one another to engage in . . . such conduct . . . are accessories’ ” even if it cannot be determined beyond reasonable doubt who fired fatal shot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.