United States v. Walter Levy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even if admission of statement violated Rule 11(e)(6), its admission was harmless because it was cumulative of earlier, properly admitted statements
• concluding that the error in the jury instruction was harmless because there was “an abundance of evidence pointing to the defendant’s guilt”
• finding that the instructional error was harmless because there was “an abundance of evidence pointing to the defendant’s guilt”
• finding a defendant's offer to work as an informant for the DEA \evidence[d] a consciousness of guilt\ and showed the defendant was aware \he was in serious difficulty with the law and needed to do something to extricate himself\
• accused is required to make manifest an intention to seek a plea bargain before choosing the route of self-incrimination
• accused is required to make manifest an intention to seek a plea bargain before choosing the route of self-incrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).