Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/24/2001
State v. Davis
Citations
- 255 Conn. 782
- 772 A.2d 559
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 114
- 2001 WL 391489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court’s failure to instruct jury regarding elements of sentence enhancement stat- ute was harmless because first element of statute was established in previous count and second element was established by uncontested and overwhelming evi- dence
- “[w]hen reviewing [a] challenged jury instruction ... we must adhere to the well settled rule that a charge to the jury is to be considered in its entirety, read as a whole, and judged by its total effect rather than by its individual component parts” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-20· cited 95×
- State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-17· cited 63×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-04-26· cited 60×
- State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-20· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-15· cited 42×
- State v. Kirk R.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-19· cited 36×
- Connelly v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-09· cited 34×
- State v. GriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-29· cited 29×
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-14· cited 29×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-03· cited 28×
- State v. BermudezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-26· cited 28×
- State v. BarberConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-07· cited 28×
- State v. CoronaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-23· cited 26×
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-27· cited 22×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-06-20· cited 19×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 18×
- State v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-13· cited 17×
- Janusauskas v. FichmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-03-19· cited 16×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- Sustache-Rivera v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2000-07-25· cited 131×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-17· cited 121×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-25· cited 95×
- State v. VelascoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-16· cited 89×
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 87×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-18· cited 85×
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-01· cited 83×
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-18· cited 81×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-09-01· cited 78×
- State v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-01· cited 77×
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-17· cited 77×
- In re Ralph M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 65×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-09· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.