Arizona Supreme Court· 3/22/1984
State v. Gonzales
Citations
- 681 P.2d 1368
- 140 Ariz. 349
- 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exclusion of evidence of mental disease when relevant to a material issue is a denial of due process
- exclusion of evidence of mental disease when relevant to a material issue is a denial of due process
- psychiatric testimony of organic brain damage to show defendant’s mental condition relevant to facts in dispute and must not be excluded
- expert testimony of defendant’s mild retardation and organic brain syndrome admissible to substantiate defendant’s credibility as well as his “mere presence” defense
- “In determining whether the probative value of evidence outweighs the danger of prejudice and confusion, the trial court must examine the purpose of the offer. [Citation omitted.]”
- exclusion of expert testimony on defendant’s low intelligence, mild retardation, and probable organic brain syndrome constituted denial of due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Holohan, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 713×
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 249×
- State v. HydeArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 167×
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 160×
- Kight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-07-09· cited 60×
- State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 27×
- State v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-05-16· cited 23×
- State v. UriarteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-08-27· cited 19×
- State v. KrantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-28· cited 17×
- State v. DrukeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-10-30· cited 11×
- State v. VessCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-01-21· cited 8×
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-10-03· cited 8×
- State v. MottCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-12· cited 5×
- State v. FrustinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-10· cited 4×
- Heiden v. TrujilloNinth Circuit· 2006-05-03
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court· 1981-04-14· cited 126×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 115×
- State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 76×
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-07-30· cited 34×
- People v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1973-02-07· cited 27×
- State v. LanningCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-19· cited 17×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-12-05· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-13· cited 7×
- State v. BetancourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-22· cited 6×
- Herman v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-01-28· cited 3×
- People v. SanchezNew York Supreme Court· 1982-01-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.