State v. Babcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• con- cluding that because it was “debatable whether” the pros- ecutor’s statements were likely to imply “that only guilty people go to trial,” the trial court could have “stricken” the contested statements or given a curative instruction to rem- edy any prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-12· cited 4×
• State v. Adair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-07· cited 3×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-20· cited 2×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-09· cited 1×
• State v. Babcock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. Gornick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-09· cited 282×
• State v. Chitwood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-10-20· cited 196×
• State v. Durant
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-08-09· cited 85×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-31· cited 82×
• State v. Soprych
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 21×
• Heroff v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10· cited 18×