Skip to main content

State v. Sterling

Citations

  • 834 N.W.2d 162
  • 2013 WL 3816102
  • 2013 Minn. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate courts “review the circumstantial evidence not as isolated facts, but as a whole”
  • “To the extent that Sterling’s assertions in his pro se brief are intended to raise other claims without citation to the record or legal authority, we conclude that those claims, whatever they may be, fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Been, Consideration, Lillehaug, Submission, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.