Skip to main content
· 7/22/2011

State v. Cannafax

Citations

  • 344 S.W.3d 279
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 971
  • 2011 WL 2976912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the State is only required to present “slight corroborating facts” to support the defendant’s statement in order to satisfy the corpus delicti rule
  • “it is important to note that an instruction covering a broad period of time may not be given when doing so would nullify an alibi defense that is supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis, Barney, Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.