Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 411 S.E.2d 220
  • 306 S.C. 246
  • 1991 S.C. LEXIS 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacillating voir dire responses by prospective capital jurors are proper grounds for peremptorily strikes
  • vacillating voir dire responses by prospective capital jurors are proper grounds for peremptorily strikes
  • defendant may present argument regarding facts that are in evidence to direct the jury’s attention to the circumstances of the crime or the defendant’s own characteristics since these are proper sentencing considerations
  • defendant may present argument regarding facts that are in evidence to direct the jury's attention to the circumstances of the crime or the defendant's own characteristics since these are proper sentencing considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.