Southerland v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the petitioner must prove that he or she was prejudiced by such deficiency to the extent of there being a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different”
• Southerland “met his burden of demonstrating both that appellate counsel’s performance was deficient and that, but for the deficient performance, the result of his appeal would have been different”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).