Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/11/1992
State v. Patterson
Citations
- 414 S.E.2d 155
- 307 S.C. 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the trial court’s findings regarding purposeful discrimination rest largely upon its evaluation of the prosecutor’s credibility and are afforded great deference
- noting the trial court's findings regarding purposeful discrimination rest largely upon its evaluation of the prosecutor's credibility and are afforded great deference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 48×
- Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 25×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 10×
- State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-11-13· cited 8×
- State v. GrateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-09-21· cited 6×
- State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-02-12· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-12-29· cited 28×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14· cited 24×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-11-12· cited 21×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-09-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.