Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/27/2009

Brown v. State

Citations

680 S.E.2d 909
383 S.C. 506
2009 S.C. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the solicitor’s improper appeal to the jury’s emotions was not prejudicial in light of the fact that there were four unrelated, adult witnesses to the defendant’s rape of the child victim, as well as other direct evidence that a rape occurred
finding the improper appeal to the jurors’ emotions was not prejudicial when other, overwhelming evidence supported the child victim’s assertion that she was raped by the defendant
stating this Court will not uphold the findings of the PCR court if no probative evidence supports those findings
finding the solicitor improperly appealed to the jurors’ emotions during closing argument when telling them to “speak up” for the child victim and “make sure that the perpetrator is punished”
finding error in asking the jury to “speak up” for the child victim
finding error in asking the jury to “speak up” for child victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.