Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/13/2016

State v. Walker

Citations

277 Or. App. 397
372 P.3d 540
2016 WL 1452429
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that an informant’s reliable report, including its conclusion, can sometimes be considered in the totality of the circumstances to establish reasonable suspicion
explaining that a hunch or intuition is insufficient to justify an officer’s interference with a person’s liberty
noting that law enforcement may not “interfere with [a] person’s liberty based only on intu- ition or a hunch”; rather, an officer must reasonably suspect the person of past, current, or imminent criminal activity
law enforcement may not “interfere with [a] person’s liberty based only on intuition or a hunch”
whether an officer’s subjective suspicion of criminal activity is objectively reasonable will often depend on the inference drawn from the particular circumstances confronting the officer
an officer may have “reasonable suspicion” sufficient to justify an investigatory stop of a person even if the officer does not have sufficient reason to believe that it is probable that the person has committed, or is about to commit, a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.