State v. Dame

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In determining the admissibility of photographs, the district court must consider the relevance of each 8 photograph and must also weigh the probative value of that photograph against its prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leake v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 146×
• State v. Schulz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-02-03· cited 50×
• State v. Fraga
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-06-28· cited 15×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-11-16· cited 12×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DeZeler
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-13· cited 123×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 86×
• State v. Burch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-08-15· cited 78×
• State v. Henderson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-11· cited 73×
• State v. Jobe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-06-26· cited 52×
• State v. Walen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 51×
• State v. Sanders
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-10-18· cited 42×
• State v. Crandall
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-03-20· cited 40×
• State v. Costello
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 38×
• State v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 27×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-10-27· cited 16×
• People v. Galimanis
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-01-25· cited 12×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-20· cited 10×
• Shepherd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-12-18· cited 10×
• State v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-06-25· cited 9×
• State v. Stahlberg
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-09-10· cited 1×