Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/3/2005
State v. Schulz
Citations
- 691 N.W.2d 474
- 2005 Minn. LEXIS 54
- 2005 WL 245775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that incriminating voicemail message “had a devastating impact on the defendant’s case” but there was no support in the record that the evidence gave the State an unfair advantage
- noting that defendant’s “tone of voice and inflection is evidence” that may be considered by factfinder
- stating that evidence is relevant when it “warrants a jury in drawing a logical inference assisting, even though remotely, the determination of the issue in question”
- stating that evidence is relevant “when taken alone or in connection of other facts, [it] warrants a jury in drawing a logical inference assisting, even though remotely, the determination of the issue in question”
- photo of defendant’s tattoo admissible when it helped to identify voice on telephone audiotape claiming to have committed the crime
- “Evidence is relevant and has probative value when it, in some degree, advances the inquiry.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 98×
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-04-06· cited 65×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-08-24· cited 65×
- State v. WembleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-04-25· cited 47×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 45×
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-25· cited 36×
- State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew MosleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-09-24· cited 36×
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-05· cited 33×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-03-09· cited 32×
- Belmar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-24· cited 22×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-07-03· cited 22×
- Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-12-30· cited 21×
- In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF Gary George SPICERCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-08-18· cited 18×
- State v. SwingerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-08-01· cited 16×
- State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-07-23· cited 16×
- State v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-05-31· cited 15×
- State v. FragaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-06-28· cited 15×
- Ptacek v. Earthsoils, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-03-31· cited 6×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-12-09· cited 2×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-09-20· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-13· cited 123×
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 113×
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-23· cited 89×
- United States v. Laurence John LaytonNinth Circuit· 1985-07-29· cited 70×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-09· cited 70×
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-05· cited 47×
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-10· cited 47×
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-12· cited 43×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-07-20· cited 42×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-08-03· cited 36×
- Colby v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-02-09· cited 21×
- State v. AxfordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-12-18· cited 19×
- Hiedeman v. HiedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-05-07· cited 12×
- State v. DameSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-10-23· cited 8×
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-06· cited 8×
- State v. EbertSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-04-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.